#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 3, 2013 10:47:21 GMT
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus: 14-15.6 metres in length, weighing up to 12-13 tons  Carcharodontosaurus saharicus: 12-13 metres in length, weighing up to 7 tons  |
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 3, 2013 10:50:35 GMT
I believe that Spinosaurus would win this because it had a bulkier build, it was far more massive and powerful, and had much larger and potent arms and claws. Spinosaurus also had a stronger bite force, because its conical and robust teeth were used for gripping and impaling, where as Carcharodontosaurus' teeth were used for slashing through flesh.
|
|
JSR - T-7500
Yutyrannus
Posts: 53 Likes Received: 0 
Youtube: PrimaCarnageJac01
Steam: JSR.T-7500
Joined: Oct 5, 2013 9:24:57 GMT
inherit
11
0
Nov 22, 2013 15:28:20 GMT
0
JSR - T-7500
53
October 2013
jm1998
PrimaCarnageJac01
JSR.T-7500
|
Post by JSR - T-7500 on Nov 3, 2013 15:45:08 GMT
But Spinosaurus isn't a much of a hunter. It's teeth are for gripping on large slippy fish. When it comes to season drouts, the spino has to adventure off the river and get prey by scavenging, it wasn't a theropod that can run quick, they have to put up a fight with Carcharondontosaurus, the spino wouldn't take a rise of killing a big hunter, it needs food to live not to rise dangers. If they fight to the death, Carcharodontosaurus might kill it? the speed of carcho is quicker then spino, the carcho wouldn't dare to attack the spino from the front because of spinos claws. Being more lightweight which is carcho can move faster. Remember these are animals not monsters, us like humans and animals feel pain when bitten.
In favor of 40/60
40 for Carcho (If in a pack or a pair, its has to be a 80)
60 for Spino
|
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 3, 2013 16:51:22 GMT
But Spinosaurus isn't a much of a hunter. It's teeth are for gripping on large slippy fish. When it comes to season drouts, the spino has to adventure off the river and get prey by scavenging, it wasn't a theropod that can run quick, they have to put up a fight with Carcharondontosaurus, the spino wouldn't take a rise of killing a big hunter, it needs food to live not to rise dangers. If they fight to the death, Carcharodontosaurus might kill it? the speed of carcho is quicker then spino, the carcho wouldn't dare to attack the spino from the front because of spinos claws. Being more lightweight which is carcho can move faster. Remember these are animals not monsters, us like humans and animals feel pain when bitten. In favor of 40/60 40 for Carcho (If in a pack or a pair, its has to be a 80) 60 for Spino Spinosaurus wasn't much of a hunter? False. Spinosaurus hunted very powerful and dangerous fish, such as Oncopristis (an 8 metre long sawfish) and other 6 metre fish with hide thicker than bone. There is also evidence that Baryonyx (a close relative of Spinosaurus) hunted iguanodon, so Spinosaurus would be easily capable of hunting some of the prey that Carcharodontosaurus hunted. Neither Carcharodontosaurus or Spinosaurus were fast predators, because they were both above elephant-sized. The difference in speed would be minute. I personally think this fight would be 75/25 in Spinosaurus' favour. |
|
inherit
14
0
7
Lmpkio
I have returned!
1,200
October 2013
lmpkio
|
Post by Lmpkio on Nov 3, 2013 17:10:53 GMT
|
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 3, 2013 17:46:21 GMT
Spinosaurus would probably just knock Carcharodontosaurus onto the ground using its massive bulk. |
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Nov 4, 2013 15:25:24 GMT
But Spinosaurus isn't a much of a hunter. It's teeth are for gripping on large slippy fish. When it comes to season drouts, the spino has to adventure off the river and get prey by scavenging, it wasn't a theropod that can run quick, they have to put up a fight with Carcharondontosaurus, the spino wouldn't take a rise of killing a big hunter, it needs food to live not to rise dangers. If they fight to the death, Carcharodontosaurus might kill it? the speed of carcho is quicker then spino, the carcho wouldn't dare to attack the spino from the front because of spinos claws. Being more lightweight which is carcho can move faster. Remember these are animals not monsters, us like humans and animals feel pain when bitten. In favor of 40/60 40 for Carcho (If in a pack or a pair, its has to be a 80) 60 for Spino Keep in mind those were gigantic sawfish. This is not a race so speed doesn't matter. Also multi-ton animals aren't fast, Carcha is still really heavy. It's not that fast and speed wouldn't help anyway. |
|
nanolancensis
Yutyrannus
If you can't beat 'em... call in a T. rex to eat 'em.
Posts: 53 Likes Received: 7
Youtube: Nanotyrannus Lancensis
Favourite Dinosaur: Spinosaurus aegypticus
Favourite Animal: Loxodonta africana
Joined: Nov 2, 2013 15:23:13 GMT
inherit
32
0
Mar 10, 2016 22:20:00 GMT
7
nanolancensis
If you can't beat 'em... call in a T. rex to eat 'em.
53
November 2013
nanolancensis
Nanotyrannus Lancensis
Spinosaurus aegypticus
Loxodonta africana
|
Post by nanolancensis on Nov 7, 2013 4:29:07 GMT
70/30 in favor of Carcharodontosaurus. It has a much larger jaw, a stronger bite, and likely more agility. Spinosaurus was larger, and weighed more, but unless it had a bison-back, it would die due to it's big flashy sail being a massive target. Sailback COULD in theory repeatedly slash and hack at the Carchar's throat until it bleeds out, and Bisonback could simply crush it under it's sheer bulk alone, but Carcharodontosaurus would be the most common victor.
|
|
inherit
14
0
7
Lmpkio
I have returned!
1,200
October 2013
lmpkio
|
Post by Lmpkio on Nov 7, 2013 6:14:22 GMT
I think it would be a 55/45 in favor of Spino. (Look at my video)
|
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 7, 2013 7:42:57 GMT
70/30 in favor of Carcharodontosaurus. It has a much larger jaw, a stronger bite, and likely more agility. Spinosaurus was larger, and weighed more, but unless it had a bison-back, it would die due to it's big flashy sail being a massive target. Sailback COULD in theory repeatedly slash and hack at the Carchar's throat until it bleeds out, and Bisonback could simply crush it under it's sheer bulk alone, but Carcharodontosaurus would be the most common victor. Spinosaurus had a MUSCLE RIDGE, not a sail. Carcharodontosaurus had a weaker bite force than Spinosaurus at their common lengths. Spinosaurus would win 70/30 of the time, because the only advantages Carcharodontosaurus had were agility and a larger skull. |
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 7, 2013 7:44:10 GMT
I think it would be a 55/45 in favor of Spino. (Look at my video) It would probably be more like 70/30 in favour of Spinosaurus. |
|
inherit
30
0
13
raptorx863
Quiz Time! What's the only genus of lizard that can shoot a jet of slime out of it's tail?
289
October 2013
raptorx863
http://www.youtube.com/user/RaptorX863
raptorx863
|
Post by raptorx863 on Nov 7, 2013 15:03:33 GMT
70/30 in favor of Carcharodontosaurus. It has a much larger jaw, a stronger bite, and likely more agility. Spinosaurus was larger, and weighed more, but unless it had a bison-back, it would die due to it's big flashy sail being a massive target. Sailback COULD in theory repeatedly slash and hack at the Carchar's throat until it bleeds out, and Bisonback could simply crush it under it's sheer bulk alone, but Carcharodontosaurus would be the most common victor. Spinosaurus had a MUSCLE RIDGE, not a sail. Carcharodontosaurus had a weaker bite force than Spinosaurus at their common lengths. Spinosaurus would win 70/30 of the time, because the only advantages Carcharodontosaurus had were agility and a larger skull. It didn't even have agility. At both of their sizes, inertia and nerve issues would prevent them both from turning fast. Any T.rex-sized animal would be completely unable to turn more than 45 degrees in 2 seconds from the inertia created by their huge bodies, and the nerve signals were too slow to allow them to twist and turn out of the way of oncoming attacks. Carcharo's only got it's big skull going for it, but that's not really enough at this point. |
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Nov 7, 2013 15:44:40 GMT
Both had a similar biteforce, Spinosaurus had a stronger bite due to its size advantage though. Spinosaurus win this 70/30 due to its size advantage.
Ps.: I know I had posted here before... Just saying.
|
|
#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on Nov 7, 2013 15:54:31 GMT
Both had a similar biteforce, Spinosaurus had a stronger bite due to its size advantage though. Spinosaurus win this 70/30 due to its size advantage. Ps.: I know I had posted here before... Just saying.Yep |
|
nanolancensis
Yutyrannus
If you can't beat 'em... call in a T. rex to eat 'em.
Posts: 53 Likes Received: 7
Youtube: Nanotyrannus Lancensis
Favourite Dinosaur: Spinosaurus aegypticus
Favourite Animal: Loxodonta africana
Joined: Nov 2, 2013 15:23:13 GMT
inherit
32
0
Mar 10, 2016 22:20:00 GMT
7
nanolancensis
If you can't beat 'em... call in a T. rex to eat 'em.
53
November 2013
nanolancensis
Nanotyrannus Lancensis
Spinosaurus aegypticus
Loxodonta africana
|
Post by nanolancensis on Nov 7, 2013 16:37:45 GMT
70/30 in favor of Carcharodontosaurus. It has a much larger jaw, a stronger bite, and likely more agility. Spinosaurus was larger, and weighed more, but unless it had a bison-back, it would die due to it's big flashy sail being a massive target. Sailback COULD in theory repeatedly slash and hack at the Carchar's throat until it bleeds out, and Bisonback could simply crush it under it's sheer bulk alone, but Carcharodontosaurus would be the most common victor. Spinosaurus had a MUSCLE RIDGE, not a sail. Carcharodontosaurus had a weaker bite force than Spinosaurus at their common lengths. Spinosaurus would win 70/30 of the time, because the only advantages Carcharodontosaurus had were agility and a larger skull. Well, like I said, if it was a muscle ridge/bisonback, it would be 50/50 or 60/40 in favor of Spinosaurus. I just didn't clarify it enough. The Spinosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus have very similar bite forces, but if Spinosaurus had a sail back, it would be hard to defend itself unless it could get the first bite or claw the opponent's face. Like you said, a Muscle-Ridged/Bison-Backed Spinoaurus would have better chances. |
|
