#00be0f
5
0
1
48
Allosaurus Rex
Jurassic Killer
531
October 2013
cryolophosaurus
CryolophoFan2010
Allosaurus
Harpy Eagle
|
Post by Allosaurus Rex on Oct 5, 2013 1:47:58 GMT
Allosaurus fragilis
Albertosaurus sarcophagus
|
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 5, 2013 1:50:20 GMT
Albertosaurus wins. Its bulkier, more agile, larger, a stronger bite force and its taller. Albertosaurus wins 75% of the time.
|
|
#00be0f
5
0
1
48
Allosaurus Rex
Jurassic Killer
531
October 2013
cryolophosaurus
CryolophoFan2010
Allosaurus
Harpy Eagle
|
Post by Allosaurus Rex on Oct 5, 2013 1:51:20 GMT
albertosaurus would win 55/45 imo, it is faster, bulkier and has a stronger bite. allosaurus could cause some serious damage though.
|
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 5, 2013 1:53:38 GMT
Albertosaurus is actually bigger than allosaurus, allosaurus is 8.5-9.7 metres long while albertosaurus is 9-10 metres long. I have also heard of a 11.8 metre Albertosaurus lurking around.
|
|
#00be0f
5
0
1
48
Allosaurus Rex
Jurassic Killer
531
October 2013
cryolophosaurus
CryolophoFan2010
Allosaurus
Harpy Eagle
|
Post by Allosaurus Rex on Oct 5, 2013 1:55:02 GMT
11.8 m albertosaurus?
|
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 5, 2013 1:58:32 GMT
Yeah I have heard of one, I am doubting the measurements though. Its either a freak or a miscalculation like pete 3 the 11 metre daspletosaurus which really wasen't 11 metres after all.
|
|
inherit
4
0
37
Rexog
547
October 2013
rexog90
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoX42kpWN0w0_qNhrMnVUFg
Rektog
Oxalaia Quilombensis
Jaguar
|
Post by Rexog on Oct 5, 2013 19:15:36 GMT
I think allosaurus would win, because it was larger, more agule and faster, it weapons were the claws, it tail and and a special attack to used to break the bones or rip ou members of it prey, albertosaurus had an stronger bite, but only that.
|
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Oct 5, 2013 19:18:31 GMT
I think allosaurus would win, because it was larger, more agule and faster, it weapons were the claws, it tail and and a special attack to used to break the bones or rip ou members of it prey, albertosaurus had an stronger bite, but only that. Albertosaurus is actually bigger, allosaurus is 8.5-9 meters long while albertosaurus is 9-10 meters long |
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 5, 2013 19:49:48 GMT
I think allosaurus would win, because it was larger, more agule and faster, it weapons were the claws, it tail and and a special attack to used to break the bones or rip ou members of it prey, albertosaurus had an stronger bite, but only that. Most of what you said is the other way round. Albertosaurus is faster(This is not an advantage), more agile and it was larger. The claws and arms are an advantage to Allosaurus, Theropods don't use tails as weapons and it Allosaurus's hachet bite attack won't work well an opponent larger and taller than itself. |
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Oct 5, 2013 19:54:32 GMT
I think allosaurus would win, because it was larger, more agule and faster, it weapons were the claws, it tail and and a special attack to used to break the bones or rip ou members of it prey, albertosaurus had an stronger bite, but only that. Most of what you said is the other way round. Albertosaurus is faster(This is not an advantage), more agile and it was larger. The claws and arms are an advantage to Allosaurus, Theropods don't use tails as weapons and it Allosaurus's hachet bite attack won't work well an opponent larger and taller than itself. Yeah, mostly because the hatchet bite was probably used to cause blood loss until the victim dies. |
|
inherit
7
0
6
nickstens
Off the forum for the moment. IDK when I'll be back...
688
October 2013
nickstens
|
Post by nickstens on Oct 5, 2013 19:59:20 GMT
I'll say Allo
|
|
inherit
9
0
Feb 21, 2017 11:58:22 GMT
79
es1001
1,498
October 2013
es1001
http://www.youtube.com/user/Entersandman1001
esandman1001
TheSandman
Tyrannosaurus
Great White Shark
|
Post by es1001 on Oct 6, 2013 0:02:22 GMT
Albertosaurus would pull it off. A close battle, but when it comes down to it, bulk, bite, and agility are going to win you the fight. Even if you are only better in those areas by a small margin
40/60 to Albertosaurus.
|
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 6, 2013 0:05:55 GMT
The correct term is 60/40 Albertosaurus, saying it 40/60 says you would support Allosaurus in a fight. |
|
inherit
17
0
11
Aliens218 | Allosaurus
231
October 2013
aliens218
blatantly obvious
|
Post by Aliens218 | Allosaurus on Oct 11, 2013 17:43:40 GMT
I think Allosaurus would win this fight. It's quick and agile.
|
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Oct 11, 2013 22:40:27 GMT
I think Allosaurus would win this fight. It's quick and agile. How does speed help on a dinosaur fight? |
|
