#00be0f
3
0
1
Feb 24, 2019 19:15:10 GMT
415
themechabaryonyx789
Bowie Dave
4,993
October 2013
themechabaryonyx789
TheMechaBaryonyx789
Baryonyx
Tings
|
Post by themechabaryonyx789 on May 2, 2014 20:25:27 GMT
That is only at length parity. Yes, at length parity it's quite one-sided, it would be much more fair if we took AMNH 5767 into consideration. True. That particular Allosaurus could be over 3 tons in weight if scaled from Big Al. |
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on May 2, 2014 20:42:37 GMT
Yes, at length parity it's quite one-sided, it would be much more fair if we took AMNH 5767 into consideration. True. That particular Allosaurus could be over 3 tons in weight if scaled from Big Al. Maybe, but not necessarily, specimens tend to vary a lot from one to one, and if AMNH 5767 is just an adult synonym it would have to be more robustly built due to allometric scaling. |
|
ornitholestes
Yutyrannus
Posts: 69 Likes Received: 15
Joined: Apr 20, 2014 8:31:00 GMT
inherit
91
0
15
ornitholestes
69
April 2014
ornitholestes
|
Post by ornitholestes on May 3, 2014 17:07:30 GMT
AMNH 5767 is one specimen. Yes, it is T. rex sized, but with so many specimens of Allosaurus known, it won’t have considerable impact on the average size.
If we are just matching up specimens, AMNH 5767 would easily devastate any Daspletosaurus, but it is exceptionally large, the only Allosaurus that is considerably larger than 10m (the largest other specimens are ~10-10.4m). On the other hand, AMNH 680 would also be enough for that.
It all depends, what sizes do we take?
|
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on May 3, 2014 17:41:27 GMT
AMNH 5767 is one specimen. Yes, it is T. rex sized, but with so many specimens of Allosaurus known, it won’t have considerable impact on the average size. If we are just matching up specimens, AMNH 5767 would easily devastate any Daspletosaurus, but it is exceptionally large, the only Allosaurus that is considerably larger than 10m (the largest other specimens are ~10-10.4m). On the other hand, AMNH 680 would also be enough for that. It all depends, what sizes do we take? Yes, I meant to say if AMNH 5767 is just an adult specimen of Allosaurus fragilis.Using AMNH 5767 would be quite one-sided, it's a lot better to take similar weights, which also answers your question, the OP also suggested parity, even though Daspletosaurus torosus would be heavier, but that already gets the point across. |
|
inherit
29
0
7
Carnage
Back on track.
326
Oct 25, 2013 17:12:58 GMT
October 2013
carnage96
DinosaurCarnage1996
|
Post by Carnage on Dec 17, 2014 19:15:58 GMT
Daspletosaurus wins
|
|
inherit
197
0
3
AdianPC
313
Mar 11, 2015 14:03:57 GMT
March 2015
adianpc
Adian PC
adian.kolcakovic1
Dont have :(
T-rex
Crocodile
|
Post by AdianPC on Mar 14, 2015 21:31:15 GMT
Definely Daspletosaurus
|
|
inherit
171
0
Feb 10, 2018 14:22:46 GMT
78
parasaurolophus
And they say Swans and Geese were the same animal :P
1,313
Dec 22, 2014 15:21:28 GMT
December 2014
parasaurolophus
Parasaurolophus, Suchiomimus
Zerbra, Gazelle
|
Post by parasaurolophus on Mar 15, 2015 0:27:08 GMT
Yeah I think Daspletosaurus wins also.
|
|
Keep on truckin.