Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0 Likes Received:
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
18
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2013 2:01:16 GMT
Fasolasuchus  8–10 meters (26.4–33 ft)Sarcosuchus 11.65 m (38.2 ft)
|
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 13, 2013 17:24:18 GMT
Sarchosuchus wins, its much larger(7 tons) and can be 12 metres long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0 Likes Received:
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
18
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2013 20:49:34 GMT
Sarchosuchus wins, its much larger(7 tons) and can be 12 metres long. hmmm in water yes on land...50/50 |
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 13, 2013 22:28:48 GMT
Fasolasuchus is only about 3-5 tons while sarcosuchus is 7+ tons in weight. A massive size advantage. Its also 2 metres longer than Fasolasuchus
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0 Likes Received:
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
18
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2013 22:33:05 GMT
Fasolasuchus is only about 3-5 tons while sarcosuchus is 7+ tons in weight. A massive size advantage. Its also 2 metres longer than Fasolasuchus Actually they believe the largest Fasolasuchus is believed to be 35 feet long which would only mean it was short by about 4-5 feet. Not just that but fasolasuchus was actually considerably fast while sarchosuchus is such a massive crocodile it would be considerably slow but we really don't know because both animals don't have a lot of supporting evidence well sarcho does, not fasola... |
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Oct 13, 2013 22:49:58 GMT
Fasolasuchus is only about 3-5 tons while sarcosuchus is 7+ tons in weight. A massive size advantage. Its also 2 metres longer than Fasolasuchus Actually they believe the largest Fasolasuchus is believed to be 35 feet long which would only mean it was short by about 4-5 feet. Not just that but fasolasuchus was actually considerably fast while sarchosuchus is such a massive crocodile it would be considerably slow but we really don't know because both animals don't have a lot of supporting evidence well sarcho does, not fasola... Multi ton animals are generally not very fast at all so I doubt fasolasuchus would be an exception. Also length is not size but weight is size and sarcosuchus is heavier by 4-2 tons. A MASSIVE size advantage. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0 Likes Received:
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
18
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2013 22:55:11 GMT
Actually they believe the largest Fasolasuchus is believed to be 35 feet long which would only mean it was short by about 4-5 feet. Not just that but fasolasuchus was actually considerably fast while sarchosuchus is such a massive crocodile it would be considerably slow but we really don't know because both animals don't have a lot of supporting evidence well sarcho does, not fasola... Multi ton animals are generally not very fast at all so I doubt fasolasuchus would be an exception. Also length is not size but weight is size and sarcosuchus is heavier by 4-2 tons. A MASSIVE size advantage. But if its 4-2 tons bigger and both animals are about the same size that would make sarchosuchus considerably slower... |
|
inherit
17
0
11
Aliens218 | Allosaurus
231
October 2013
aliens218
blatantly obvious
|
Post by Aliens218 | Allosaurus on Oct 14, 2013 0:21:12 GMT
Yeah, Sarchosuchus had a size advantage, and if it got one grip of Fasolasuchus, it'd be doomed.
|
|
#00be0f
5
0
1
48
Allosaurus Rex
Jurassic Killer
531
October 2013
cryolophosaurus
CryolophoFan2010
Allosaurus
Harpy Eagle
|
Post by Allosaurus Rex on Oct 14, 2013 0:26:40 GMT
sarcosuchus would win.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0 Likes Received:
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
18
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 24, 2024 22:25:29 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2013 0:42:10 GMT
lol who voted for the fasolasuchus? |
|
#00be0f
1
0
1
Sept 19, 2022 0:50:28 GMT
1,130
Theropod
12,650
October 2013
admin
Theropoda Entertainment
Ask through PM
Thero
Genyodectes
Eagle
{"image":"https://66.media.tumblr.com/bec0264f6aea4d9a0137ba0694abea69/tumblr_mmae6u05vY1relrdqo1_1280.jpg","color":"000000"}
460000
ff9900
Example 1
|
Post by Theropod on Oct 14, 2013 21:41:13 GMT
Fasolasuchus is only about 3-5 tons while sarcosuchus is 7+ tons in weight. A massive size advantage. Its also 2 metres longer than Fasolasuchus Actually they believe the largest Fasolasuchus is believed to be 35 feet long which would only mean it was short by about 4-5 feet. Not just that but fasolasuchus was actually considerably fast while sarchosuchus is such a massive crocodile it would be considerably slow but we really don't know because both animals don't have a lot of supporting evidence well sarcho does, not fasola... As mentioned before by Sporerex, length does not mean size, weight does. Given the fact it was over 2 tons, Fasolasuchus wouldn't be really fast either. Plus Sarcosuchus was nearly twice Fasola's size, which means it was much stronger. Speed wouldn't help either, what matters is that one of them was much deadlier due to its strength. Sarcosuchus wins. |
|
#00be0f
10
0
1
140
thesporerex
"May the flames guide thee"
2,872
October 2013
thesporerex
Example 4
|
Post by thesporerex on Jan 22, 2014 10:58:04 GMT
((bump))
|
|
inherit
29
0
7
Carnage
Back on track.
326
Oct 25, 2013 17:12:58 GMT
October 2013
carnage96
DinosaurCarnage1996
|
Post by Carnage on Dec 18, 2014 16:14:24 GMT
Sarcosuchus wins without much trouble, though it might be a better match on land
|
|
inherit
197
0
3
AdianPC
313
Mar 11, 2015 14:03:57 GMT
March 2015
adianpc
Adian PC
adian.kolcakovic1
Dont have :(
T-rex
Crocodile
|
Post by AdianPC on Mar 13, 2015 20:11:40 GMT
Sarcosuchus
|
|
inherit
171
0
Feb 10, 2018 14:22:46 GMT
78
parasaurolophus
And they say Swans and Geese were the same animal :P
1,313
Dec 22, 2014 15:21:28 GMT
December 2014
parasaurolophus
Parasaurolophus, Suchiomimus
Zerbra, Gazelle
|
Post by parasaurolophus on Mar 13, 2015 20:13:17 GMT
I say Sarco aswell
|
|
Keep on truckin.