Albertosaurus vs Styracosaurus

I have changed my mind about this.




Albertosaurus has a more reliable weapon, which is its biteforce. It can do more well-aimed attacks. They'll always be face-to-face here because Albertosaurus can't outflank Styracosaurus, Ceratopsians have very little rotational inertia due to their compact bodies. Meanwhile, Tyrannosaurids have more enlongated bodies and heavy heads, which makes them very heavy far from the torso, and making themselves less aerodynamic. Ceratopsians also have wide-gauge front limbs which allow them to turn and move faster than predators, so there is no "outflanking" here. They'll be always face-to-face and as I have said Albertosaurus can perform a more well-aimed attack with its much more reliable weaponry. A bite from Albertosaurus could end it. As the comparison above indicates, Styracosaurus was not as tall as Albertosaurus and Scott Hartman's very reliable skeletal shows that Styracosaurus albertensis has a horn curved downwards, which with those heights is not gonna be so effective since it is curved down, requiring more force to stab through the predator's skin, as well as due to the ceratopsian's poor neck mobility caused by its vertebrae, even though it has fused neck vertebrae and a ball-and-socket joint at the base of the skull. I am leaning towards Albertosaurus sarcophagus due to its superior, more reliable weaponry.

Its in a running stance

It also looks taller and I have explained why. The running stance makes it taller than it would be in normal conditions.

It was originally stated by Spinodontosaurus from Carnivora that it is taller due to its running stance.