Deltadromeus vs Carnotaurus

except i never referred to bahariasaurs at all, didn't i? i referred directly to deltadromeus, who's proportions directly suggest an animal of a very slender build. the similarities of bahaiariasaurus and deltadromeus is even more fragmentary then that of spinosaurus and oxalaia, so i don't feel like getting into another debate about the possibility of one taxon being synonymous to another due to lack of evidence.

let me spell it out

P-O-S-S-O-B-I-L-L-I-T-I-E-S

never once said that i completely agree with sed judgment. only refereed to it as, again....

P-O-S-S-O-B-I-L-L-I-T-I-E-S

i only acknowledge the fact that there is nothing refuting this idea and therefore, should be put into consideration. nothing wrong with this consideration, nothing wrong with other considerations until more discoveries prove otherwise. it can be wrong, or through a series of discoveries, it might surprise us and give us the first direct evidence of theropods accomplishing transcontinental locomotion.

either way, this has no value to this fight. i only referred to deltadromeus, not bahariasaurus. deltadromeus, despite it's suggested size, has the proportions of a much smaller animal, hence the fact that it's bones are comparatively longer, yet smaller in circumference compared to small to midsized theropods such as ceratosaurus and allosaurus. meaning it was indeed, very slender

who said i didn't consider it? man, stop making random assumptions about what i am or am not certain of. if you want the short answer, then let me give it to you. I AM OPEN MINDED TO BOTH IDEAS. i am not directly favoring or stating anything. if you must know, there are some indications of bahariasaurus being synomynous with deltadromeus, which would make me CONSIDER the idea. but as of now, i'm not willing to dig in depth with it.

because i was never referring to, or even on the topic of discussing the possible synonymous taxon of deltadromeus and bahariasaurus. thats something you just came up and accused me of for some apparent reason. from my post, it directly accused the majority of the posts who thought of deltadromeus as a massive, robustly built theropod who would pawn carnotaurus given the chance. while instead, i gave the reasons on why this is false, as deltadromeus was not thick or possibly even carnivorous due to how slim and elongated it was. to me, thats enough to call this a predator/ prey relationship, as carnotaurus has every possible advantage.

where do you see me even on the subject on discussing the possibilities synonymous taxons anywhere in those posts?

oops ((bash)), looks like i was referring to bahariasaurus size when providing judgement on deltadromeus. my bad. i must of been mistakenly thinking about it while typing deltadromeus length. thanks for the correction

but i didn't, didn't i? it's because i DECIDED not because i DIDN'T want to because i DIDN'T think about it.  i only discussed why deltadromeus was likely a slim ceratosaur. i haven't stated the likelihood of them being synonynous because i only wanted to discuss the topic, which called for "deltadromeus vs carnotaurus". not "is deltadromeus synonymous with bahariasaurus" which for the latter, people has claimed that deltadromeus was a large carnivore that can kill carnotaurus, even though it's the other way around. i mean seriously, i know i have been bringing up taxon that could of been analogous to one another for a few threads, but you really expect me to bring it up in every post i made?