Pivot Chat

{EDIT} Just occurred to me that the previous sentence is a bit hard to understand in full. The basic translation is this: "if members of a community, nation, or even a forum do things that were never explicitly stated to be legal in an amendment and were never said to be okay informally (prior to the topic having been brought up, of course. Perhaps I could have thought it was just not policed correctly or had not occurred to the admin that it was against the original intent, which was the only thing official which I had to go upon, and I thought it was important enough to bring up), then it's perfectly okay to do it without any interruption from anyone? At the very least, there should be some formal acknowledgement so there isn't any more unnecessary discussion such as this. I, personally, like to know what our current leaders have decided is the current stance on specific topics, be they of major importance or not."

i'm pretty tired of this but I know mr. stubborn pants over here wont stop until he has the last word (never really does too often. haven't seen it myself, anyway, even when we're doing nothing more than joking around. does anyone have a screenshot of theropod not being the last one in a one-on-one discussion before he leaves {never entering the discussion all doesn't count, and of course it must be genuine and not doctored whatsoever.} prior to the minute this post was uploaded? I'm genuinely curious). i want the (currently, unless of course an amendment is made saying that it is no longer the following) unrelated and useless discussion (as it is currently considered by yours truly) to stop, and i want at least some compensation (in the form of better policing and/or warning that any more unrelated posts will be removed) or formal acknowledgement that it is ok to do, as of now. once that happens I'll stop complaining.