Pivot Chat

Here's a revised way to rate stks.

Appearence - x/10
Functionality - x/10
Ease to use - x/10

While the criteria remain almost untouched, functionality is no longer determined by opinion. In order to measure the functionality of a stk;

1. Count the number of dynamic segments (repeats don't count, like legs and arms);
2. Count how many of them are functional;
3. Each entirely functional segment is a 10/10.

When a segment is unfunctional, calculate how much of its movement range is affected; so if half of it is affected, the segment is 5/10.

Now, sum up all the segment scores, and divide the result by the number of dynamic segments. Example;

50 segments, 49 are fully functional, one is a 5/10.
48*10 = 480
480+5 = 485
485/50 = 9.7

So the functionality is 9.7/10. Let's assume the stk scores 10/10 in the other two criteria, so the total sum is
10+10+9.7 = 29.7
29.7/3 = 9.9

The stk is rated 9.9.

I have tested this method on several stks, and a difference of 0.1 means a lot. The default Pivot stk is rated 7, for example.